The Role of ECOWAS in Mediating Democratic Crises: Lessons from Mali, Guinea and Niger

Authors

  • Nyenwe Emem Okey Onuchuku Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Rumuolumeni, PMB 5047, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • Chibuzor Chile Nwobueze Okey Onuchuku Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Rumuolumeni, PMB 5047, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/cejsr.v45i3.663

Keywords:

ECOWAS, Democratic Crises, Mali, Guinea, Niger

Abstract

This article rigorously analyses the involvement of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in addressing democratic challenges in Mali, Guinea, and Niger. Recently, the three nations have seen unconstitutional governmental transitions, prompting urgent concerns about regional stability, governance, and the efficacy of ECOWAS' intervention strategies. This paper does a comparative examination of three incidents, examining the political backdrop of the coups, the type and rapidity of ECOWAS' involvement, and the effectiveness of ECOWAS' mediation efforts. It underscores significant problems, including as limited enforcement capabilities, conflicting interests among member states, and increasing public disenchantment with democratic institutions. Notwithstanding these limitations, the paper delineates relevant insights from ECOWAS' diplomatic strategies, sanctions frameworks, and negotiating methodologies. The report asserts that, while ECOWAS is a vital entity in fostering constitutional order, its efficacy depends on reforming its conflict-resolution strategies, improving its unity, and better aligning with the aspirations of West African residents. It advocates for enhancing ECOWAS's capacity to avert and address imminent democratic crises in the region.

References

[1] A. Adebajo, Building Peace in West Africa: Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea-Bissau, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002.

[2] J. Akokpari, “ECOWAS, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Regional Intervention in West Africa,” Journal of African Political Economy, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 215–230, 2023.

[3] K. Aning and A. M. S. Bah, “ECOWAS and Conflict Prevention in West Africa: Confronting the Triple Threats,” African Security, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–31, 2010.

[4] A. Arieff, “Guinea’s Political Crisis and the Return of Military Rule,” 2021.

[5] B. Buzan and O. Wæver, Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

[6] B. Charbonneau, The Military Intervention in Mali and Beyond: An African Model of International Intervention?, London: Routledge, 2021.

[7] L. Diamond, The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies throughout the World, New York: Henry Holt, 2008.

[8] ECOWAS, Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance. Supplementary to the Mechanism for Conflict Prevention, Management, Resolution, Peacekeeping and Security, 2001.

[9] C. Ero, “ECOWAS and the Challenge of Political Crisis Management in West Africa,” ISS Today, 2019.

[10] E. Gyimah-Boadi, “Africa’s Waning Democratic Commitment,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 101–113, 2015.

[11] R. O. Keohane and J. S. Nye, Power and Interdependence, 3rd ed., Longman, 2001.

[12] S. Levitsky and L. A. Way, Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

[13] K. Omeje, “ECOWAS and the Crisis of Democratic Consolidation in West Africa,” African Security Review, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 239–253, 2020.

[14] ECOWAS, Mechanism for Conflict Prevention, Management, Resolution, Peacekeeping and Security, Abuja: ECOWAS Commission, 1999.

[15] A. Adekeye and R. Murithi, “The Role of Regional Organizations in African Peace and Security Architecture,” Institute for Security Studies Monograph, no. 204, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-23

How to Cite

Emem, N., & Nwobueze, C. C. (2025). The Role of ECOWAS in Mediating Democratic Crises: Lessons from Mali, Guinea and Niger. Middle European Scientific Bulletin, 45(3), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.51699/cejsr.v45i3.663